Agreed.
Mike W.
"Taylor, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
67C8E1BFE53ED2118CEC0008C7A4B20706096970@USLAXEXC04">news:67C8E1BFE53ED2118CEC0008C7A4B20706096970@USLAXEXC04...
> I have to disagree here. I read the original post and the follow-up and
> can't consider it a flame. The questions listed are basic enough that the
> test taker should be able to answer all of them, and if s/he's not able
to,
> more study is required. Your point is taken about English possibly being a
> stumbling block concerning the NDA, and Cisco should probably address
that.
>
> It's too bad Poor Tong didn't pass, but recommending that he study until
he
> can approach each of the certification objectives is hardly a flame.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Stockton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 3:07 PM
> To: NoOneYouKnow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: real CCNA question that I have in exam
>
>
> I have not read the non-disclosure agreement and will most certainly abide
> by it whenever I agree to. However, it is not in the best interest of
> anyone on this list for you to flame them. Yes, you are flaming the
> gentleman when you insinuate that the information required to pass this
test
> is not that difficult and also suggesting that he should not have taken
the
> exam if he does not know the answers to the questions he is referring too.
> I hope that everyone who has taken the exams has gotten the maximum score.
> If you personally did not, you are living in a glass house and throwing
> stones.
>
> It appears that english is not the first language of the individual
> requesting assistance. Perhaps there is a translation issue here. Is
> english the only language this exam is offered in? Obviously, additional
> effort should be made at the test centers to explain in more detail what
the
> non-disclosure agreement means. I just do not think that if Poor Tong
> understood the non-disclosure agreement thoroughly, he would have violated
> in this type of public forum. Appears to be a serious communication break
> down somewhere.
>
> Poor Tong, if this is something you really want, please continue to read,
> research and study.
>
> ms
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > NoOneYouKnow
> > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 2:49 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: real CCNA question that I have in exam
> >
> >
> > Please don't take this a a flame, but I think you need to buy a book and
> > read a little. These questions are so basic that I am surprised that you
> > even tried the test with this level of knowledge. The CCNA isn't rocket
> > science (having studied rocket science I can attest to this), but
> > it should
> > not be taken lightly.
> >
> > BTW, posting actual questions from you test is a violation of the
> > non-disclosure agreement you agreed to before you took the test.
> > Unlike the
> > Microsoft cert folks, Cisco cert folks tend to actually take this
> > agreement
> > seriously. In keeping with that, it is unlikely that you will get
> > answers to
> > these questions, since answering any that may have been on the test
would
> > likely also be a violation.
> >
> > ---JRE---
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Will'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Howard C. Berkowitz'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > "'Fanglo P.M. MA'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Johnny Dedon'"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Tia Crawford'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"'Kevin
> > Wigle'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Brad Ellis'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > "'Mathieu Nantel'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Priscilla
Oppenheimer'"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2000 4:37 AM
> > Subject: real CCNA question that I have in exam
> >
> >
> > > Hi.. Dear all,
> > >
> > > I took CCNA 2.0 today and failed
> > >
> > > and I like to ask some question, pls help if you can and tell me what
is
> > the
> > > reason. The question and answer may not be exact
> > >
> > > 1)Which of the command are true.
> > >
> > > A)
> > > Router IGRP
> > > network 192.168.0.0
> > > network 10.0.0.0
> > >
> > > B)
> > > Router IGRP
> > > network 192.168.0.0
> > > network 10.2.0.0
> > >
> > > C)
> > > Router TGRP
> > > network 192.168.0.0 255.255.240.0
> > > network 10.2.0.0 x.x.x.x cannot remember
> > >
> > >
> > > 2)ICMP is designed for all TCP/IP host? True or false?
> > >
> > > 3)Which of the following are frame switching? choose two
> > > 1)Full Duplex
> > > 2)Half Duplex
> > > 3)Cut thru
> > > 4)store and forward
> > >
> > > 4)Bridge flood broadcast? Ture of false?
> > >
> > > 5)Bridge increase collision domain? true or false?
> > >
> > > 6)for IP 172.37.2.56 and 12 bit subnet mask.
> > >
> > > What is the valid IP range
> > > A)172.37.2.48- 172.37.2.62
> > > B)172.37.2.48-172.37.2.63
> > > C)172.37.2.49-172.37.2.62
> > > and etc
> > >
> > > 7)If router A interface s0 connected to router B interface S0
> > > Router A interface 's encap is novel-ether then how about serial 0 of
> > > router B?
> > >
> > > 8)when you type router#show ver.
> > >
> > > it shows configuration register is 0X0101?
> > > where is the router booted from?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much,
> > >
> > > Poor Tong
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
****************************************************************************
*
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
else
> is unauthorized.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution
> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited
> and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
> contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in
> the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
>
****************************************************************************
*
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
