I may have misunderstood your router configs and your original design, but
it looked like you have r1e0 connected to r2e0, r1s0 to r2s0, and r1s1 to
r2s1. If this isn't the case, then never mind, ignore what I said! <g>
Regardless, you should start with connecting one link only and get it
working the way you think it should. Once you get a single link working, it
might be educational to start adding the other links and see how it affects
your routing tables. You could also try doing this with different routing
protocols to see if things behave any differently.
> On 3 Jul 2000 00:39:25 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Neiberger) wrote:
>
> >Another issue, which would make things fun to play with, is the fact
that
> >you have three links between the same two routers.
>
> Sorry, I don't follow you.
> Could you show the parameters that indicate the three links? I didn't
> think I had them seeing each other at all ;-)
>
> Well, if nothing else, the lab showed me I need to reread my book and
> do some more studying before playing in the environment.
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
