That config would only be valid for a 2900XL or 3500XL, right? I'm not sure
how this would be configured on a Set-command switch like a 5000.
And IIRC, multi-vlan ports are not allowed if there are any trunk ports
configured on that switch, so that's something to watch for. I might be
wrong on both counts, so take this with a grain of salt! :-)
John Neiberger
>
>
> You can have the server be a part of both VLANs without having to do any
> routing.. Here's a config snip with an example.
>
> Everything defaults to VLAN 1, so no extra configuration on any of the
> ports that will be only on vlan 1.
>
> For clients on the second vlan, do this for every port that you want on
> VLAN 2:
>
> interface FastEthernet0/13 (or whatever port it is)
> switchport access vlan2
>
>
> now.. for the server, who you want to be part of both VLANs do this
>
>
> interface FastEthernet0/1
> switchport mode multi
> swithport multi vlan 1,2
>
>
>
> That will give you 2 seperate VLANs both being able to connect to the
> server on port 1 (in this scenerio.)
>
> Be careful, in this case machines on both VLANs can connect to to the
> server, the server can connect to any machine on either VLAN, but clients
> on VLAN 1 can not connect to clients on VLAN 2 and vice versa. For this
> it would be beneficial to put a router in place to route between to two
> networks.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
>
> Paul Schultz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Darren Blake wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am new to this list so sorry if this has been asked before.
> > I am really confused about the benefits/setup of Vlans. The more
reading I
> > do on the subject, the more confused I get.
> > Say, I have a network of 100 users who all access a file server and
Internet
> > router. How can I split them up into 2 vlans when they all need to
access
> > the file server and Internet router. I know it is possible to use a
'router
> > on a stick' to enable communication between the vlans but can you
make the
> > file server/router members of both vlans without a separate router?
Are
> > there any performance/config issues by making them members of both
vlans.?
> > Also is there any way to assign ports to vlans other than manually
> > configuring them. For example say I had two subnets 192.168.14.0 and
> > 192.168.15.0 on my network. Is it possible to automatically setup two
vlans
> > so the machines on the 14 subnet are assigned to 1 vlan and the
machines on
> > the 15 subnet to the other ( I know its possible to automatically
assign
> > based on Mac address - but that still means you have to find out all
the MAC
> > addresses on your network ).
> > Any info or pointers to further reading would be grateful.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Darren
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]