I share your curiousity about these access-list issues. Answers anybody ?
Bharat Suneja
"John Mairs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering a couple of things and wanted to know
> if someone could shed some light this. Since, when
> doing access lists (un-named), you use protocol number
> ranges (eg.800-899 IPX Std., 100-199 IP ext., etc.)why
> then do they "require" that you mention the protocol
> when applying it to the interface (IP
> access-group..bla bla bla) when by virtue of being
> forced to use ranges this makes which protocol you are
> using clear anyway. Or in reverse, why are ranges
> necessary if you indicate which protocol it is you're
> using when you apply the list.
>
> Also, I am a bit confused as to when you would ever be
> able to get any use out of using a wildcard mask on
> the host portion of an IPX address in an access list.
> What I mean by that is I can understand its use in IP
> since you assign the Network.Host number but since IPX
> uses the BIA of the card for the host, the odds of
> having a range in any kind of sequence seems
> astronomical.
>
> Just some things that were bugging me... thanks.
>
> John Mairs
>
> =====
> John L. Mairs
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
