Try 
passive-interface default
no passive-interface s0 (or whatever)
Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RIP.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Redistribution question [7:66071]
> 
> 
> I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP 
> as my routing
> protocol.  One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity 
> to another
> organization.  The others do not need to receive RIP updates.  So, the
> solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive 
> interfaces so
> that RIP updates are not sent out interfaces that do not have any RIP
> routers.  I also have 3 VLANs where I only need a static 
> route, so I have
> added those as passive interfaces for EIGRP too.  My question 
> is:  is this
> the most efficient way to do it?
> I imagine that in a very large network, adding every single 
> interface as a
> passive interface would get old rather quickly.  Any suggestions?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66148&t=66071
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to