Maybe I'm simple but RIP v1 is classfull last time I looked. Also check for the command IP SUBNET-ZERO, it may come in handy.
Steve Wilson Network Engineer -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 13:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redistributing Static within RIP version 1 - what is this mask [7:66245] With the following configuration, RIP do not redistribute the static route; if the static route is changed to /24, it does redistribute. R1 ip route 195.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 null 0 ! router rip version 1 network 192.168.13.0 redistribute static There is no other interfaces using the net 195.x.x.x With the "ip route 195.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 null 0" (/24), the route is advertised: Debug in R1 shows that it does not advertise the route 195.0.0.0 With 195.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 it does advertise: 1d00h: network 10.0.0.0 metric 1 1d00h: network 192.168.13.0 metric 1 1d00h: network 195.0.0.0 metric 1 I did not find any notes about this behavior. The article "Behavior of RIP and IGRP When Sending and Receiving Updates" do not cover this. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66254&t=66254 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
