Not necessarily, it could just mean that ICMP replies are disabled. Traceroute doesn't use the same mechanism as ping, and thus traceroute will give you end to end connectivity, but by trying to get response times using ICMP ping wont work as many people disable this. (Meant to minimise reconaissance scans).
Richard Campbell wrote: > > Hi.. I forward you a part of the pathping result to my web > server, can you > take a look on the 15th and 16th hop. Why it drops all the > packets 100/100? > Does it mean that it doesn't accept ping or the connection to > there is > really that bad?? I suspect the intermitent connection problem > is due to > unknown.Level3.net [209.246.46.90]? Do you agree with that?? > Why I can't > ping 209.246.46.90 ? > > > 0/ 100 = 0% | > 11 245ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% > ae0-55.mp1.SanJose1.Level3.net > [64.159.2.129] > 0/ 100 = 0% | > 12 324ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% > so-0-2-0.bbr2.Washington1.level3.net [64.159.0.250] > 0/ 100 = 0% | > 13 337ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% > gige9-1.ipcolo1.Washington1.Level3.net [64.159.18.99] > 6/ 100 = 6% | > 14 332ms 22/ 100 = 22% 16/ 100 = 16% unknown.Level3.net > [209.246.46.90] > 0/ 100 = 0% | > 15 --- 100/ 100 =100% 94/ 100 = 94% > gigabitethernet4-1.dca2a-fcor-rt1.netsrv.xxx.com [150.109.3.9] > 0/ 100 = 0% | > 16 --- 100/ 100 =100% 94/ 100 = 94% > vlan40.dca2a-fdisa-sw2-msfc1.netsrv.xxx.com [150.109.3.158] > 0/ 100 = 0% | > 17 306ms 6/ 100 = 6% 0/ 100 = 0% 160.109.20.100 > 7/ 100 = 7% | > 18 320ms 13/ 100 = 13% 0/ 100 = 0% rt [160.109.17.200] > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66603&t=66601 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
