Larry, what's the "costly upgrade" all about? I saw two 48-port 10/100/1000
blades introduced. One is for "performance" and the other for "value". Do
both need the upgrade to the chassis?

Thanks!!


Jeffrey Reed
Classic Networking, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry
Letterman
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851]

we have had the 16 port 10/100/1000 blade for a while in the cat 6000 line.
As DRE says, the 48 port version will be out soon..however it will require
a costly upgrade to the chassis...


Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems





> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> dre
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851]
>
>
> ""Greg Rend""  wrote in message ...
> > Does anyone know if/when Cisco is going to announce a standalone
> > (2950, 3550), triple speed switch? If there is already one out
> > there from Cisco (standalone) please excuse my ignorance. I haven't
> > been about to track one down. I know Cisco has a 3550-12T Switch
> > but ony 12 10/100/1000 ports. Word on the street is that Cisco is
> > going to announce a higher density, anyone have any news?
>
> Well considering Cisco just came out with the Sup720 and have
> 10/100/1000 modules for the 6500 platform finally on the official
> roadmap (announcement in May) -- I don't forsee them having it on
> smaller switches in bulk until much later.  10/100/1000 has been
> available on the Catalyst 4000 series for quite some time now,
> however, so that would likely be the platform of choice for
> 10/100/1000 applications.  Or maybe another vendor.
>
> -dre




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66923&t=66851
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to