Also, are you doing it via "one arm routing" or do you have separate interfaces in each vlan? ( fa0/0 in vlan or lan x, fa0/1 in vlan or lan y, etc., etc. )
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/knowledge/wan/subifs.htm You should definitely use sub-interfaces though...... ( Reference above ) Scotty ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > It's funny that we are seeing this message after seeing all those complaints > about the CCDP recert exam including AppleTalk! :-) > > =?WINDOWS-1255?Q?=F7=E5=F8=EF__=EC=E1 wrote: > > > > Does anyone have an idea on that: > > we use 7200 in the center of a big bay-networks routers > > we use ipx , ip and appletalk > > ip , ipx works fine in FR/PPP links and OSPF etc.. > > apple talk zones and routing are shown ok on the macintosh > > machines > > All zones are showing up on the Macs? That's a good sign. > > Routing wouldn't show up on the Macs, but do all routes show up on the > routers? > > Most AppleTalk problems are related to routing, not finding services. To > avoid problems with split horizon, be sure to use Frame Relay subinterfaces. > > > there is appletalk services advertised on PPP links > > AppleTalk services are never advertised. Users look for them. > > > but they are not advertised on FR links > > routing is RTMP , zones are ok on FR links > > just the macintosh servers does not show up on FR !! > > Do you mean that servers don't show up when users who are across the Frame > Relay network try to find them? That is indeed strange. > > > no access-lists of any kind > > Hmmm. It does seem like an access list problem, though.... > > It also sounds like it could be a duplicate network number. If this is a new > or updated design, it's pretty common to mistakenly reuse an AppleTalk cable > range, or have overlapping ranges. Other than misconfigured access lists, > that's the only time I've ever seen such a strange result as what you're > seeing, if I understand what you're seeing (zones and routes OK, but users > can't find services). > > If it's been upgraded to AppleTalk over IP and Mac OS X, then it's a whole > other story. I think Mac OS X uses Service Location Protocol, which is > multicast based and requires IGMP and an IP multicast routing protocol to be > working correctly. > > Is this a new problem? What changed? What version of Mac OS are the users > using? Is this pure AppleTalk or AppleTalk over TCP/IP? > > I might be willing to help if you could send more info on what's happening, > version numbers, config, etc. > > Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70044&t=69961 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
