I would have to agree with Dom. CBWFQ is probably your best bet as you can set up your classes for the various traffic types that you have sniffed out.
""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Not to mention I just realized after posting this my access-list is > screwed up it should be. > > Access-list should actually look like this > > Access-list 199 permit tcp any any eq www > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 PM > To: Elijah Savage; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] > > It looks like a job for Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing (CBWFQing). > As you have already put a sniffer on to identify the legitimate traffic > etc it should be no problem to setup. > > If you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me > off-list. > > Best regards, > > Dom Stocqueler > Zoo Keeper - SysDom Technologies > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Elijah Savage > Sent: 12 June 2003 02:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] > > > All, > > Long story short we have a point to point t1 back to corporate. While > using nbar on the router along with sniffers 90% of the traffic is web > based and things like sql transfers and legitimate business traffic is > timing out because of congestion basically the t1 is maxed out during > working hours. At night legit traffic runs great no one in the office > and no http traffic and things are great. > > I know this is a management problem about appropriate use and management > knows also after I presented them with this data but they want to do > something short term to throttle http traffic. > > > Can I use generic traffic shaping like below so that http does not > consume no more than half of the link see below. > > Example > > int s0/0 > traffic-shape group 199 500000 62500 62500 > > access-list 199 permit 80 any any > > > On CCO I can only find this done with standard access-list nothing about > extended access-list is mentioned that I can find. > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configur > ation_guide_chapter09186a00800c60cc.html > > Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70580&t=70559 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
