As you've reminded me many times, Annlee, one really needs a security policy and a threat assessment before going into the details of the security architecture solution. SAFE doesn't give much guidance on policy formulation.
I'm concerned with the goal statement of the original poster, "Want to go for network security, e.g., protect against virus attack," when virus attack isn't even a network security issue -- it's a host issue. Arguably, worm, as opposed to virus attacks, are both host and network, because they can affect bandwidth. At 1:40 PM +0000 6/19/03, annlee wrote: >Here's a good place to start -- > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns170/ns171/ns128/networking_solutions_package.html > >Pick a blueprint appropriate to your organization's size and the type of >networking you do. SAFE is a mental architecture, as much as anything -- >it's a "think about the whole problem but solve it in increments" kind of >approach, I think. > >HTH > >Annlee > >""milind tare"" wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Dear All, >> >> >> i hv following setup;- >> >> >> 2 6506 core switches having redundancy. 10 Nos. 3508 >> Distribution Switches. and 3500 series access's >> switches. in whole plant i hv 140 switches. >> >> want to go for network security. e.g. protect from >> virus attact , hacking so can anyone sugest me cisco >> product. please give me the URL also so i can study. >> >> Thanks & Regards, > > milind Tare Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70932&t=70841 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
