Daniel Cotts wrote: > > I have a printed copy of errata for Doyle Vol I that indicates > 18 errors. > That is correct for my copy (1st printing) of the book. The > format is such > that I must have printed it from the CiscoPress site. > The new errata - indicating two errors - has information not > included in my > printed copy. > Does a publisher make minor corrections between printings?
Yes, a publisher does make corrections between printings. > If > so, we should > hope they keep multiple errata. Errata are supposed to be plural. The singular is erratum. (Doesn't that sound awful? :-) Seriously, that would be terrible if the only errata page you can get now matches the latest printing, when thousands of people have older printings, but I bet that is the case... Managing errata per printing would require structure, planning, common sense, ability to work well with details, and other things missing from typical workplaces these days. :-) Priscilla > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Plus if > > you can believe the errata at Cisco Press's site for Doyle > > Volume 1, there > > were only 2 mistakes in the book!? > > > > (I think that's a mistake, as in they forgot to publish the > > rest of the > > pages. Although Doyle's book is terrific, I doubt that it > > really only has 2 > > mistakes? But maybe. Check with Cisco Press. See if you can > > get them to > > publish a better errata....) > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72438&t=72431 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
