ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 20.20.10.1 200 is the ISDN... the backup link, NO load sharing :)
""M.C. van den Bovenkamp"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > H T wrote: > > > can any one tell us what will be the effect of these 2 default routes. > > > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 20.20.20.1 > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 20.20.10.1 200 > > Configured like this everything will go to 20.20.20.1, until that > address becomes unavailable for some reason (link down, say). When that > happens, the route to 20.20.10.1 will be put in the routing table and > everything will go there for as long as 20.20.20.1 stays unreachable. > > This is because of the higher admin distance of the second route. > > All this assuming this is all the routing the box has, of course. > > > is it possible to have 2 default route??? > > Yes. Just put them both in with the same admin distance (leave out the > '200' at the end of the second route statement) and they will both show > up in the routing table. > > The box will then load-share between the two either on a per-destination > or a per-packet basis, depending on a number of things (fast switching > yes/no, CEF per-packet load balancing active yes/no). > > Regards, > > Marco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72656&t=72652 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
