I would guess that using policing to set the dscp is more intensive as all the token bucket counters need to be taken into account. This is just my guess though.
Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 July 2003 13:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Which is more CPU intensive? [7:72792] Which is more CPU intensive. Using set ip dscp with CBWFQ or policing to mark traffic dscp values with CBWFQ? Muhtari Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72810&t=72792 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
