I think your project would benefit greatly from Chapter 4 of Caslow's book
Cisco Certification . Paraphrased point of *possible* interest for
you:  avoid mismatched OSPF hello parameters by setting
up each interface as point to multipoint, ie, ip ospf network
point-to-multipoint.

The rest is quite an enjoyable read. Cory, if you don't already have
this book, I recommend getting it....it will help on the CCNP tests
for sure....Caslow is THE MAN.

-Brennan


"Stull, Cory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
0D7A05A19CE4D211BD050008C7330FE7147F40@CCUPDC">news:0D7A05A19CE4D211BD050008C7330FE7147F40@CCUPDC...
> If I have a partially meshed frame-relay network running OSPF...   Lets
say
> 7 sites total.  2 of the main sites have PVCs to every remote site... but
> none of the remote sites have PVCs between each other.   So how can I set
> this up so that each remote site can communicate to each remote site and
if
> one of the central sites goes down it can still use the other central site
> for connectivity???
>
> I thought that I had to use frame-relay map ip statements to get the
remote
> sites to be able to communicate through a central site but if that site
goes
> down and theres another one there that can be used how does it know to
> communicate through the other site?
>
> Can I use multiple frame-relay map ip statements using different
PVCs/DLCIs
> to the remote subnet?
>
>
>
> Thanks for the help...
>
>
>
>
> Cory R. Stull
> MCSE, Bay Router Specialist, CCNA,CCDA
> Communications Concepts Unlimited
> 262-814-7214
>
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---


___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to