What?  Your kidding right?   First off I had no idea of what most of your
acronyms stand for and second off even if I told the guy to go look on CCO
do you think it would have helped him?   He would have had to research EIGRP
for hours to find out what I explained in 1 paragraph and he probably got
almost as much out of it.  At least he understood what I was saying.   You
must be in a bad mood ElephantChild.  Thats all I'll say.

Cory

-----Original Message-----
From: ElephantChild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 10:06 AM
To: Stull, Cory
Cc: Sandeep Kulkarni; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: eigrp Messages


On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Stull, Cory wrote:

> The 2 routers are physically on the same ethernet but not on the same IP
> subnet..  EIGRP is just letting you know that it is seeing the EIGRP hello
> messages being sent out from the other router but that it cannot establish
> it as a neighbor router because its not on the same IP subnet...   Same
> thing happens in my lab when I have all of the routers ethernet ports
> plugged into the same hub and have them configured for OSPF...   If there
is
> nothing else on that physical ethernet that you would need the router(s)
to
> establish neighbor relationships with you could always setup a passive
> interface...  
> 
> List guru's, if I'm off track a little here would you please let us know?
> Thanks

<rant>Your statement is correct as far as I can tell. However, this
question is answered in TFM, and IMAO, the only acceptable answer to
such a question is RTFM (perhaps with a pointer to TFM). The purpose of
this list isn't feeding people, it's teaching them to hunt.</rant>

-- 
Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you want to experience
true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty Rhoades.

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to