I have almost this exact configuration on a larger scale. We also put the
servers in their own vlan to reduce broadcast (16 servers). Granted I had
alot of help from the Cisco rep during install so I am still learning. We
have two class C's subnetted into 8 VLANs. Works great. 
Andrew Johns CCNA CNA A+

-----Original Message-----
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 6:10 PM
To: 'Daniel Boutet'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets


No problem Daniel, and thanks to you and the others who replied to my msg.

Ole

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.insync.net/~drews/ccnp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Boutet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets


I noticed after I sent. Sorry Ole


"Ole Drews Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB313972@RWR_MAIL_SVR">news:2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB313972@RWR_MAIL_SVR...
> That was only to show which VLAN's I assigned which layer 3 addresses
for...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ole
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Ole Drews Jensen
>  Systems Network Manager
>  CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
>  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  http://www.insync.net/~drews/ccnp
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Boutet1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:22 AM
> To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
>
>
> I have one problem with this scenario:
>
> Why did you put VLAN under layer 3 info?
>
> As far as I know they are strictly L2
>
> My two cents:
>
> Assuming that they have their own servers, and that you are not routing
> between them
> then they can have any address that you wish (private). It is like having
> two LANs.
> The switches can also be totally separate.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Ole Drews Jensen
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 9:48 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
>
>
> I have a question about implementing VLAN's in existing LAN's.
>
> Let's say that I have one office with stacked switches connecting 100
users
> to a network with a couple of servers and other good stuff.
>
> Layer 2 info : Ethernet, one big broadcast domain
> Layer 3 info : IP, one full class C : 192.168.16.0
>
> After having analyzed the entire LAN, I find out that 50 users are using
> resources that the other 50 users are not using, and the same thing the
> other way around. Instead of splitting the stacked switches up in two
> separated physical stacks, I now assign the ports for the first 50 users
to
> VLAN 11 and for the rest 50 users VLAN 12.
>
> Layer 2 info : Ethernet, two big broadcast domains (not including
> VLAN1)
> Layer 3 info : IP, one full class C : 192.168.16.0
>
> I would assume that this would work great as long as noone from VLAN 11
> needs any resources from VLAN 12, and the same thing the other way around.
>
> Now to my question (which is more a confirmation of my theory):
>
> I would only need to split my class C up in subnets if I want Inter-VLAN
> communication between my VLAN 11 and VLAN 12 right???
>
> Layer 2 info : Ethernet, two big broadcast domains (not including
> VLAN1)
> Layer 3 info : IP, VLAN 11 : 192.168.16.64/26, VLAN 12 :
> 192.168.16.128/26
>
> Do I have the right idea, or am I way off???
>
> Thanks for your comments on this.
>
> Ole
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Ole Drews Jensen
>  Systems Network Manager
>  CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
>  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  http://www.insync.net/~drews/ccnp
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to