thank you
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:46 AM
To: Yee, Jason
Cc: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: strange situation
between hop 19 and 20.......probably a congested wan link............the
"last mile"..........cheap oversubscribed bandwidth probably.
Brian
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Yee, Jason wrote:
> at which point ?
>
>
> thanks
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:41 AM
> To: Yee, Jason
> Cc: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: strange situation
>
>
>
> most likely a congested link.
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Yee, Jason wrote:
>
> > hi guys or gals
> >
> > Got this strange scenario whereby when I traceroute to a destination ip
> > address it shows high latency times between the last two hops :
attatched
> > results below
> >
> > 3 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms 203.117.0.90
> > 4 14 ms 24 ms 24 ms f0-0-r21.cyberway.com.sg [203.117.0.132]
> > 5 13 ms 15 ms 14 ms 61.8.230.1
> > 6 14 ms 23 ms 24 ms 61.8.254.91
> > 7 119 ms 118 ms 120 ms 210.175.161.137
> > 8 120 ms 119 ms 119 ms tyo-i1.tyo-core1.ntt.net
[210.175.160.43]
> > 9 222 ms 223 ms 221 ms sjc-i1.tyo-sjc1.ntt.net [210.175.160.98]
> > 10 224 ms 225 ms 225 ms p1-1-2-3.r06.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net
> > [129.250.1
> > 6.21]
> > 11 233 ms 232 ms 232 ms p4-1-0-0.r00.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net
> > [129.250.2
> > .114]
> > 12 238 ms 237 ms 236 ms p1.att.r00.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net
> > [129.250.9.3
> > 4]
> > 13 240 ms 239 ms 239 ms gbr3-p50.la2ca.ip.att.net
[12.123.28.130]
> > 14 226 ms 226 ms 227 ms gbr4-p20.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.2.69]
> > 15 234 ms 234 ms 234 ms gbr2-p100.sffca.ip.att.net
[12.122.1.190]
> > 16 236 ms 234 ms 234 ms gar1-p370.sffca.ip.att.net
[12.123.13.61]
> > 17 290 ms 291 ms 291 ms 12.123.195.21
> > 18 292 ms 293 ms 291 ms 12.125.94.10
> > 19 277 ms 279 ms 278 ms 202.161.130.21
> > 20 861 ms 861 ms 861 ms 202.161.128.202
> >
> > Trace complete.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pinging 202.161.128.202 with 32 bytes of data:
> >
> > Reply from 202.161.128.202: bytes=32 time=856ms TTL=238
> > Reply from 202.161.128.202: bytes=32 time=854ms TTL=238
> > Reply from 202.161.128.202: bytes=32 time=854ms TTL=238
> > Reply from 202.161.128.202: bytes=32 time=853ms TTL=238
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But when I do a traceroute or ping from second last hop to the
destination
> > the trace and ping times seems ok
> >
> > Router>ping 202.161.128.202
> >
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 202.161.128.202, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > !!!!!
> > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 580/583/584
ms
> > Router>trace 202.161.128.202
> >
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Tracing the route to 202.161.128.202
> >
> > 1 202.161.128.202 572 msec 572 msec 580 msec
> >
> >
> > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated
> >
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> > _________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
