hi brian

oops, you're right about the mask. Did you try the normal acl?? I got it
working with the extended acl

try this:

interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Loopback1
 ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 150.55.241.199 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 2.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 no fair-queue
 clockrate 64000
!
router eigrp 90
 network 2.0.0.0
 network 10.0.0.0
 network 137.20.0.0
 network 150.55.0.0
 distribute-list 110 out
 no auto-summary
!
!
access-list 110 permit ip any 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255


debug says:
00:10:09: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - do advertise out Serial0
00:10:09: IP-EIGRP: Int 10.1.1.0/24 metric 128256 - 256 128000
00:10:09: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:10:09: IP-EIGRP: 150.55.241.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:10:09: IP-EIGRP: 2.1.1.0/30 - denied by distribute list

so that's working fine, the same as with a normal acl



if the config was something like
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.128
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Loopback1
 ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Loopback3
 ip address 10.1.1.129 255.255.255.128
 no ip directed-broadcast

with the extended acl, both routes are advertised (so not as discribed in
the open forum doc)
see debug output

with extended acl:
00:21:17: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:21:17: IP-EIGRP: 150.55.241.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:21:17: IP-EIGRP: 2.1.1.0/30 - denied by distribute list
00:21:17: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/25 - do advertise out Serial0
<--------
00:21:17: IP-EIGRP: Int 10.1.1.0/25 metric 128256 - 256 128000
00:21:17: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.128/25 - do advertise out Serial0
<--------


with normal acl:
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: 150.55.241.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: 2.1.1.0/30 - denied by distribute list
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/25 - do advertise out Serial0
<--------
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: Int 10.1.1.0/25 metric 128256 - 256 128000
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.128/25 - do advertise out Serial0
00:24:54: IP-EIGRP: Int 10.1.1.128/25 metric 128256 - 256 128000
<--------

Same output with both acl's
with another acl
access-list 115 permit ip 255.255.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

gives the right output
00:37:11: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:37:11: IP-EIGRP: 150.55.241.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:37:11: IP-EIGRP: 2.1.1.0/30 - denied by distribute list
00:37:11: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/25 - denied by distribute list
<------- only /24 allowed
00:37:11: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.128/25 - denied by distribute list
00:37:13: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:37:13: IP-EIGRP: 150.55.241.0/24 - denied by distribute list
00:37:13: IP-EIGRP: 2.1.1.0/30 - denied by distribute list
00:37:13: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/25 - denied by distribute list
00:37:13: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.128/25 - denied by distribute list

access-list 115 permit ip 255.255.128.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
 gives the same result

as well as
access-list 116 permit ip 255.255.255.128 0.0.0.127 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

so it seems that it just does not work with an extended acl to check the
mask


Hans 


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 3 oktober 2000 15:33
Aan: Driessens.Hans
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list



access-lists use wildcard masks not netmasks........

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Driessens.Hans wrote:

> Hi ClueLess
> 
> you want to use a standard access-list instead of an extended if you are
> doing it like this. You are filtering on source address instead of
> destination address and that is no good. Also, your access-list 10 has no
> mask and uses the default. If 10.1.1.0 is the only network allowed use the
> mask /24...
> 
> interface Loopback0
>  ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback1
>  ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
> !         
> router eigrp 90
>  network 10.0.0.0
>  network 137.20.0.0
>  distribute-list 10 out
>  no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> !
> access-list 10 permit 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
> 
> Hans 
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: zondag 1 oktober 2000 4:34
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Could someone shed some light on how to use EXTENDED ACL for
> distribute-list?
> 
> I'm trying to allow only 10.1.1.0/24 route to be distributed by eigrp
> 90.  Below is config and debug ip eigrp output.  I thought ACL 110 is
> a bit "relaxed" but should have allow the 10.1.1.0/24 route to be
> distribute out.  But it got DENIED.  ACL 10 worked.
> 
> Initially, I had "access-list 110 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.0
> 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0" which I thought would be the most specific.
> But this didn't work also.
> 
> I found the URL below from Open Forum:
> http://www-1.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/OpenForum/dispnewqa.pl/6352
> If anyone have some good link on this topic, please kindly send them
> in!
> 
> Any comment welcome!
> ClueLess.
> 
> 
> r7#sh ver
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software 
> IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-DS-L), Version 11.3(11a), RELEASE
> SOFTWARE (fc1)
> Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> Compiled Mon 20-Sep-99 07:43 by jjgreen
> Image text-base: 0x03040474, data-base: 0x00001000
> 
> Partial config:
> !
> interface Loopback0
>  ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback1
>  ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
> !         
> router eigrp 90
>  network 10.0.0.0
>  network 137.20.0.0
>  distribute-list 110 out
>  no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> !
> access-list 10 permit 10.1.1.0
> access-list 110 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
> 
> With distribute-list 110 out:
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 137.20.50.0/24 - denied by distribute list
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - denied by distribute list
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
> 
> With distribute-list 10 out:
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 137.20.50.0/24 - denied by distribute list
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - do advertise out Ethernet0
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: Int 10.1.1.0/24 metric 128256 - 256 128000
> 1d21h: IP-EIGRP: 10.1.2.0/24 - denied by distribute list
> 
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDA       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
Network Administrator         
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)            

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to