Many thanx for that,
I'd missed the point completely on this one. Then
again it was fed to me by the chief design architect.
We tend to argue alot more these days !!!!!!!
Its about time I started believing in myself.
Thanks again,
Phil.
--- Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's a TCP-based session and per-packet load
> balancing gets the packets
> out of order, then TCP would put them back in order
> based on the TCP
> sequence numbers. This would happen at the end node,
> not at the router. If
> it were a UDP-based session, then an upper layer at
> the end node would have
> to do it.
>
> Priscilla
>
> At 04:13 PM 10/13/00, Phil Barker wrote:
> >Hi groupies,
> > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by
> which
> >per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets
> at
> >the remote router. Which sequence number is used
> e.g
> >is it the TCP sequence number.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Phil.
> >
>
>____________________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at
> http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> >or your free @yahoo.ie address at
> http://mail.yahoo.ie
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ________________________
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
>
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
