Thanks Tim,

       Trouble is its not in the Errata, so I have to
assume Jeff is correct. Problem is my Gold partner and
CCIE #### whatever, are arguing that 200 micro secs is
not an IOS bug but MAYBE based on a comparison with
fast Ethernet delay i.e 100 Mbit/sec yields 100 usecs.
This sounds plausible since 45 Meg pipe is set at 200
usecs. But leaves the following conundrum i.e a 2Meg
pipe yields a 20000 usec delay whereas a ANY meg <=45
Meg HSSI yields 200 usecs.

I'm not sure, Bug Versus 200 usecs ? You vote....... 

Regards,

Phil.



--- Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The
errata is here:
> 
> http://www2.ciscopress.com/uploads/errata80.pdf
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "cisco GroupStudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 12:50 PM
> Subject: Jeff Doyle Routing TCP/IP Question
> 
> 
> Hi gang,
>      Can anyone confirm p.241 of TCP/IP Routing, the
> table in question has HSSI (45Meg) pipe with a 20000
> usec delay. When I do a "show int" I get a 200 usec
> delay on my HSSI links.
> 
> Has anyone got another source of this info ?
> or an errata for the book ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil.
> 
> 
>
____________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at
> http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at
> http://mail.yahoo.ie
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pdf name=errata80.pdf



____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to