I'm pretty sure the questions aren't all worth an equal number of points.
I could be wrong though.

-Brad

At 07:13 PM 10/21/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hey Group,
>         I always wondered when taking my tests what they meant when they 
>said that there would be a 300/1000 scale. Then somebody on the list 
>explained that you start out with 300 points automatically. This is nice. I 
>just tried to figure out how many could be gotten wrong on the BSCN and came 
>up with something that I don't believe. Follow me on this one...
>
>61 questions, 690/1000 to pass. You start out with 300 so there is basically 
>700 points for a perfect score with 61 questions. Now, 700 points divided by 
>61 questions breaks out to something like 11.48 points per question. Then I 
>take 1000 - 690 and get 310 points. This is how many you can miss and still 
>pass. Finally, I divide that 310 points you can miss, by the number of
points 
>per question (310/11.48) and get this as the number of questions you can
miss 
>and still pass...27.003 (27 basically). 
>
>I may be seeing it wrong in the area where I divide the 700/61 to get the 
>number of points per question. It may be that even though you get 300, you 
>still divide 1000/61, which would give you 16.39 points per question which
in 
>the end would allow you to miss 18.9 (18 basically) questions. This sounds 
>alot more like it.
>
>This confuses me. If my initial calculation is the correct one, what this 
>shows me is that on a test that has only 61 questions, somebody can get 27 
>(almost half) of them wrong and still pass the test. Does this just sound
too 
>easy to anybody else? Am I not understanding that 300/1000 scale thing, or
is 
>this test just soooooo damn easy? Don't get me wrong, I never go for the
bare 
>minimum. In fact, I don't believe anything under 800 is satisfactory (B 
>basically), I just like to know all factors before a test. Thanks for 
>responses guys/ladies...
>
>Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 1/4-NP
><A HREF="mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
>      "If you need luck, apparently you're not prepared...Go study!"
>
   
>   ~Mark Zabludovsky~
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to