> One other thought: Keep in mind that the added 24-byte GRE 
header has  consequences for both sides of the session. If 
either the client or the server tries to send 1500-byte 
packets, the additional GRE header may result in a need for 
fragmentation, which can't happen if the DF bit is set.
 
  So your coworkers may be telling you that the ICMP dest 
unreachable (frag needed but DF bit set) messages aren't 
getting filtered, but they may be only looking at it from the 
point of view of just the client or just the server.
 
  If worse comes to worst, you can manually decrease the MTU at 
the clients and the servers. Also, if your tunnel is going over 
links that support large MTUs (> than 1524), you can increase 
the tunnel MTU. (That isn't usually the case, though.)
 
 One last thought, make sure you aren't barking up the wrong 
tree  altogether. Perhaps the fact that you aren't seeing ICMP 
dest unreachable messages is a good thing. That part is 
working. Something else is broken. 

 Do you use encryption, IPSec, or anything else fragile on that 
tunnel??
 
> Ok, that's enough rambling. &;-)<

I agree with Priscilla.  It sounds as though you may have a 
path MTU issue at stake here.  One way to test this is to do 
some MTU probes.  Since you didn't mention what type of client 
you are using, I will assume it is some form of a Winthing.  If 
you go to a DOS box and type "ping", you will notice there are 
a lot of switches/arguments that will work with ping.  You 
might want to turn on a few of these and try to ping a far end 
host on the other side of your tunnel.  For example, try this:

ping -f -l 500

if that works, try a higher value:

ping -f -l 1000

Keep going up in buffer (datagram) size until the need to 
fragment exists, but the capability to do so is turned off. You 
will know this happens when the pings start to fail.  Once you 
hit the exact number, that will tell you your path MTU.  That 
may be the MTU that you want to set when sending traffic down 
the tunnel. Priscilla is also correct that ICMP return messages 
may be blocked by your firewall (or access lists).

HTH,

Paul Werner



________________________________________________
Get your own "800" number - Free
Free voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to