Is the Cisco client capable of NDS authentication ? Why eliminate BM at all?
BorderManager will work through a PIX, it depends on what BorderManager Services you
would need. If you want to run BorderManager Proxy the Cisco will need to pass
traffic
on port 80. If you want to run VPN Services through the Cisco the Bordermanager Server
would have to have a Routable, Valid IP address and the Cisco Firewall can not be
running NAT - though this restriction may not apply with BM 3.6 due soon. For Client to
site VPN the Cisco needs to be able to pass UPD and TCP port 353, UDP port 2010 and TCP
port 213 with a protocol ID of 57.
W Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am so very glad someone wrote a post concerning VPNs and Novell. I would
> like to add to it by inserting the Cisco PIX into the mix. I would like to
> bring in a Cisco PIX Firewall and use it primarily as a 'VPN access server'
> using Cisco Secure VPN 1.1 as client software. However, here at corporate
> we are using Novell NetWare 5.1 and BorderManager VPN software. I would
> like to eliminate the BorderMangler in favor of the PIX. How do I
> effectively establish VPN access through the PIX to this Novell network?
> How would authentication to the Novell Tree be accomplished throught the
> PIX over a VPN tunnel?
>
> Any suggestions and/or tips anyone may have concerning this project would
> be most appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Raul De La Garza III
> CCNA NNCSS MCSE CNE
> Senior Network Engineer
> EmCare Incorporated
> Work 214.712.2085
> Mobile 817.991.7889
> FAX 214.712.2444
> Pager 877.270.9755
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "There is a disturbance in the force." -The Emperor
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
