On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jim Bond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
> success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html but
> I don't understand why they use 192.168.1.0.
>
> Here is my topology:
> 172.16.1.0/24(outside)---PIX---(inside)172.16.2.0/24
> I create a pool 172.16.1.100-172.16.1.200, but users
> from outside can't reach internal network.
According to this, it looks like you should have NAT. You have a different
network outside than inside.
Assuming you really mean no NAT, do you have a "static" statement mapping
the addresses to themselves?
It's a bit counterintuitive without NAT, but you should have something like
static (inside,outside) 172.16.1.0 172.16.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
See the PIX command reference regarding "static".
--
Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]