I search the archives, looked at the errata for Routing tcp/ip and did not
find a correction for the following scenario.
Chapt 8 P 373 figure 8.34
Wouldn't the summerization for
192.168.16.0/24 .0001 0000
192.168.17.0/24 .0001 0001
be 192.168.16.0 /20? The example states 192.168.16.0/23 as the answer
Why /23 ? Is this a typo or is there something I am missing? All the other
summerization were right on.
Thanks,
Daniel
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
