>Routing protocols have network-layer functionality, regardless of >whether they use an IP header, IP/UDP header, IP/BGP header, or no >header at all above the MAC header (IS-IS) to transfer their >information. > >If we can't agree that routing protocols have network-layer >functionality, we should just throw in the towel and agree that pigs >have wings. > >Priscilla Do proxy wings count? http://www.cnn.com/2000/US/10/27/when.pigs.fly.ap/ _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Zhang Jin
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Chuck Larrieu
- Re: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model George Susini
- Re: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Priscilla Oppenheimer
- Re: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip mod... Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: routing protocols vs Tcp/i... Priscilla Oppenheimer
- Re: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip mod... SBS
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Stephen Skinner
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Chuck Larrieu
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip mod... Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/i... Chuck Larrieu
- Re: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Stephen Skinner
- RE: routing protocols vs Tcp/ip model Irwin Lazar

