Uh, what are you thinking? youre about to put as 10K box on a 64k hookup.

screw the pix. pix are awefull. you really ought to invest in a better connection....
if i were you i would do that, and use something like a linux box or obenbsd box as
your firewall. either that or a cheap router doing NAT/PAT,  and use the rest of your
moolah to get a nicer connection brought in. if you have two connections, you should
use a router anyway, NOT a pix. a good router can do just about anything the pix can do
anyway. they are MUCH better for reduncany as well, dseepending on how you look at it.

fmxiao wrote:

> All kindly guys, I need some help or suggestion ....
>
> Our company has two lines connecting to Internet, one is only 64K for DNS or
> mail server,
> the other is for WWW service. We have two PC servers with NT 4.0 + MS Proxy
> 2.0 as a firewall
> Now we want to buy PIX instead of the two PCs.
> DO WE NEED ONE or TWO PIXs for this situation?
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to