RE: ACL Deny Statement & Wildcard

[Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor]

;-)

Don't worry about how I got it - it wasn't pretty. OR right.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACL Deny Statement & Wildcard


I'd say summarisation of these two addresses with wildcard is:

100.16.0.0  0.1.255.255

I've been trying to backward engineer the 238 you've got, but not too sure
where it came from.
Normal mask would be 255.254.0.0 so wildcard should be inverse (take all
octets from 255)
Been a long day. I'll very possibly realise I've messed up as soon as I
press send, but looks O.K.

Regards,

Gareth

""Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I need to deny 2 consecutive network ranges.  I'd like to combine these
into
> one statement.  Here's my example, am I correct?
>
> Example IPs:  100.16.0.0 and 100.17.0.0
>
> I want to block on the .16 & .17 space:
>
> access-list 103 deny ip 100.16.0.0 0.238.255.255 any
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Rob Montgomery
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]