Couple of amendments.  Asterisks mark several factors that are 
Cisco-implementation specific, although there are knobs to turn them 
to the IETF specified behavior.

"Frank Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote,

>This is the BGP attribute decision process:
>
>1 BGP Path Selection starts; if the next hop is inaccessible, do not 
>consider it.
>



>2 Consider larger BGP administrative weights first.

    * weight, with a scope of a single router, is Cisco-specific

>
>3 If the routers have the same weight, consider the route with 
>higher local preference.
>
>4 If the routes have the same local preference, prefer the route 
>that the specified router originated.
>
>5 If no route was originated, prefer the shorter AS path.

    * This is Cisco, not IETF, behavior, and can be disabled. The IETF 
idea seems to have been that local-preference would be set as a 
consequence of AS path filters.

>
>6 If the AS paths are of the same length, prefer external paths over 
>internal paths.
>
>7 If all paths are external, prefer the lowest origin code (IGP 
>[Interior Gateway Protocol] <EGP <INCOMPLETE).
>
>8 If origin codes are the same, prefer the path with the lowest 
>MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED). A missing metric is treated as zero.

       -- clarification:
            HIGHER weight and local preference are better
            LOWER MED is better

       * treating the missing metric as 0 is Cisco-specific; the IETF
         says to treat a missing MED as the highest possible value.
      ** By default, MEDs are comparable only between the same AS,
         unless always-consider-med is configured

>
>9 If IGP synchronization is disabled and only an internal path 
>remains, prefer the path through the closest IGP neighbor.
>
>10 Prefer the route with the lowest IP address value for the BGP router ID.

      * unless BGP load balancing is enabled.  If this feature is on, routes
        that are otherwise identical (i.e., to the same AS) will be added up
        to the BGP maximum-paths value.

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to