Let's say I have the following policy map in place (please forgive the syntactic mistakes, I'm doing it from memory): ip access-list name videolist permit udp any any eq 3230 3235 map-class video match access-group videolist policy-map videoconference class video priority 288 class class-default fair-queue random-detect int s0 encapsulation frame-relay service-policy output videoconference <extraneous stuff deleted> int s0.16 des To remote video units (this link carries other traffic, too) ip address 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 16 int s0.17 des To other sites (no video) int s0.18 des to another site (no video) Assuming this is a T-1, my goal is to set aside 288k for the video conference call, while assigning the rest of the traffic to fair queues with WRED. Is this basically alright? Now, if I need to configure a frame-relay map class to institute link fragmentation and interleaving, can I apply this new policy to int s0.16 while leaving the old policy in place on the major interface? FRF.12 must be configured at the PVC level, and I can't tell if this is possible or not from what I've seen on CCO. Also, does LFI have to be configured on both ends of a PVC? Our core router IOS does not support FRF.12 (we're upgrading in the near future) but the branch router does. If I configure LFI on one end only, will bad things happen? Thanks, as always. Now, I must go. I seem to be having some home network problems. (see earlier thread started by Chuck) <g> _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
