My apologies. I'm new to this group. I just thought since he was starting
from the point of denying each individual address that a little more
in-depth explanation was in order. After your reply though, I thought about
it, and would not want someone just to give me the answer. OK, I guess at
times I wished they would, but I supposed I am better in the long run just
figuring it out... character building and all that...
Scott
"Andy Walden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Awe, you gotta let the guy do his own work. He doesn't learn from cutting
> and pasting...
>
> andy
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Scott McClure, CCNP, CCDA, MCNE wrote:
>
> > Andy and Edward are both correct. It is much easier if you were trying
to
> > block address that fall on specific subnet blocks. To specifically
block
> > your range 192.168.100.100 - 192.168.100.254 you would need:
> >
> > The basic concept of access list wildcard masks is that any 0 in the
mask
> > means the address bit has to match, and any 1 in the mask means you
don't
> > care.
> <snip>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
