I hereby promise never to post replies under the affluence of incahol.
I need a "Delete previous post" button.
You're absolutely right. The answer was clear as day at the time, but now I
look at it again, both of your comments appear spot on.
Sorry
Gaz
""lishengtao"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
92a0l7$2e2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:92a0l7$2e2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, I know what you mean and agree with you.
>
> However, I choosed answer A during the test and was told that it is wrong.
>
> Anyway, I make me a little more clear about the access-list with your
help.
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Stanton
> ""MariaD"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 9298pk$d4a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9298pk$d4a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> > yeah, CISCO wording in their test questions can be very confusing,
> > I think in this case,
> > what they're actually asking is:
> > which of A, B, C or D is NOT AFFECTED by the access-list statement ?
> > If they asked "what would not be affected"
> > instead of
> > "what would not apply"
> > it would be clearer.
> > B, C & D are affected by the access-list statement because their ip
> > addresses are within the
> > ranges listed in the access-list statement. ( 172.16.16.0/20 and
> > 172.16.32.0/20 )
> > therefore,
> > the router will apply a MATCH and deal to those packets as appropriate.
> >
> > for A, 172.16.1.1 is not in the 172.16.16.0/20 or 172.16.32.0/20
networks
> > therefore,
> > there is NO MATCH in the access-list statement
> > so no access-list statement will be applied to 172.16.1.1 packets
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > R,
> > MariaD
> >
> >
> >
> > ""lishengtao"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > 928upd$399$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:928upd$399$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Agree with you partialy, and I think the statements of B and D are
also
> > not
> > > apply, because the telnet access with 172.16.16.1 as source and
> > 172.16.32.1
> > > as destination is denied, and the same as telnet access with
> 172.16.30.12
> > as
> > > source and 172.16.32.12 as destination.
> > >
> > > However, this question is come from Cisco's on-line test with only one
> > > choice.
> > >
> > > I am still confused.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Stanton
> > >
> > > ""MariaD"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > 928n2i$srv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:928n2i$srv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I reckon it's A
> > > > because the 172.16.1.1 address is not included in your access-list
> > > > statement.
> > > >
> > > > the addresses that would be affected are 172.16.16.0/20 to
> > 172.16.32.0/20
> > > > and 172.16.1.1/20 is in another network
> > > >
> > > > R,
> > > > MariaD
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ""lishengtao"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > 925adn$8lo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:925adn$8lo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > The following is an access-list entered on a Cisco router:
> access-list
> > > 135
> > > > > deny tcp 172.16.16.0 0.0.15.255 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255 eq telnet
> > > > access-list
> > > > > 135 permit ip any any br>Which of the following would not apply if
> > this
> > > > > access-list is used to control incoming packets on ethernet 0?
> > > > >
> > > > > A. address 172.16.1.1 will be denied telnet access to address
> > > 172.16.37.5
> > > > >
> > > > > B. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address
> > > > > 172.16.32.1
> > > > >
> > > > > C. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address
> > > > > 172.16.50.1
> > > > >
> > > > > D. address 172.16.30.12 will be permitted telnet access to
address
> > > > > 172.16.32.12
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________
> > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
