Firewalls in general do not support the passing of IPX
at layer 3. In the past I have set up GRE Tunnelling
to hop the ipx packet over IP which worked fine.
Downside is higher header overhead due to the
encapsulation of IPX over IP.
I also remeber having a problem whereby I had to
switch of fast-switching i.e "no ip route-cache" as
the novell etype 8137 disappeared after the initial
negotiation.
HTH,
Phil.
--- lawrence sculark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if
the pix does not past ipx then you need to go to
> netware ip...not ipx
> tunneling nut netware ip it will pass all of the
> updates for you through ip
> only....look at novells's site on netware ip
> configuration....best
> regards...lawrence
>
>
> >From: "sougata maitra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "sougata maitra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Can IPX traffic be forwarded thru PIX?
> >Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:39:47 -0000
> >X-Originating-IP: [151.200.108.30]
> >Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2)
> with ESMTP id
> >MHotMailBC249B590048400431923F68324B081816; Tue Jan
> 09 09:55:05 2001
> >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by
> groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
> >with SMTP id NAA15584;Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:54:13
> -0500
> >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12);
> Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:47:57
> >-0500
> >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by
> groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
> >NAA14179GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:47:56
> -0500
> >Received: from hotmail.com (f135.law7.hotmail.com
> [216.33.237.135])by
> >groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
> NAA14160GroupStudy Mailer; Tue,
> >9 Jan 2001 13:47:55 -0500
> >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com
> with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
> >Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:39:47 -0800
> >Received: from 151.200.108.30 by
> lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue,
> >09 Jan 2001 17:39:47 GMT
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 09 09:55:58 2001
> >Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2001 17:39:47.0603
> (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[2915F630:01C07A63]
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Precedence: bulk
> >
> >we are in the process of testing a PIX firewall
> 515R and all seems to work
> >fine in the IP realm.
> >we have netware servers (version 4x)running IPX
> still both on the inside
> >and
> >the outside which need to commmunicate.
> >the documentation for PIX doesn't even use the word
> IPX !!
> >
> >any ideas?
> >
> >one thought is to make the netware servers run IP
> ..but how to make them
> >exchange (SAPs) or whatever it is under IP?
> >
> >warm regards
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
