Use access lists on both sides. You can apply it to the ethernet interfaces
as an inbound ACL. For instance:
Map:
1.1.1.0/24---->RouterA---frame----RouterB<-----3.3.3.0/24
2.2.2.0/24 sec
4.4.4.0/24 secondary
router configs:
RouterA
interface e0
ip address 1.1.1.1 /24
ip address 2.2.2.2/24 secondary
access-group 101 in
access-list 101 permit ip 1.1.1.0 /24 3.3.3.0 /24
access-list 101 permit ip 2.2.2.0 /24 4.4.4.0 /24
RotuerB
interface e0
ip address 3.3.3.3 /24
ip address 4.4.4.4 /24 secondary
access-group 101 in
access-list 101 permit ip 3.3.3.0 /24 1.1.1.0 /24
access-list 101 permit ip 4.4.4.0 /24 2.2.2.0 /24
I left out the real masks cuz I'm lazy but you should get the idea. Just
rely on the normal route table for the routing. You can add a deny
statements to the ACLs with the LOG keyword to see what is being denied.
Good luck
Kenny
""md. nazri"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
005501c07ad8$18c59360$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:005501c07ad8$18c59360$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi all,
> i need some help on this,
>
> 2 routers connected over frame relay, named RouterA and RouterB. RouterA
ethernet has 2 ip address, X(x,.x.x.x) as primary and Y(y.y.y.y) as
secondary. RouterB ethernet also has 2 ip address, W(w.w.w.w) and
Z(z.z.z.z). X supposed to communicate only with W and Y only talk to Z.
There is no way that X talk to Z or Y to W. How do i achieve this by static
routing or any other ways..
>
> PLS help
>
> rgds
> nazri
> telekom malaysia
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
