Howard,
Your first post got through as well.
This is very possibly the first time I've understood one of your e-mails
without reading it four or five times. Are my studies increasing my
intelligence, or have you just made this one simple so that everyone will
drop the subject. The latter I think.
Having said that I still haven't complied with your request to let it die,
oops, sorry.
I take it you can now dispense with the disguise which Salman Rushdie so
kindly and sympathetically donated.
Gareth
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:p05001900b69a1e00b70c@[63.216.127.98]...
> I really hate to reopen this, but the posts that triggered this are
> not new. There has been no action by Cisco and there's suggestive
> evidence that the original posts were hoaxes. While Certification
> Zone has no formal relationship with Cisco, there has been
> considerable correspondence between Genium Publishing, owner of the
> Zone, and Cisco's intellectual property Legal Person, and some issues
> of concern were worked out quite some time ago.
>
> It is rather unlikely that a vice president of a major company would
> disclose a future plan for court action in a forum outside the
> company. One of the posts back when this thread began suggested the
> VP was Ed Kozol, who (1) doesn't work for Cisco any longer and was
> either gone or on sabbatical at the time of the alleged meeting and
> (2) was a member of the Wiley Networking Council that sponsors my
> recent books -- hardly an adversarial relationship.
>
> Can we let this die?
>
>
>
>
> >Is that who they are going after? Certification Zone? I have been the
> >site, and I have not seen anything that really compromises the NDA, in
fact,
> >most the papers that are there seem like interpretations of the cisco.com
> >site.
>
> I can only speak for myself as an author as well as technical
> director, but I strive to write the material from direct experience
> and from general industry knowledge. In other words, I would
> typically write most of an article and then review some specifics
> against public Cisco material, but I'm certainly not paraphrasing the
> web site.
>
> >That's a shame. Next it will be Coriolis and Sybex!
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> >Ehab Mohamad Abdullah
> >Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 2:44 AM
> >To: 'Billy Monroe'
> >Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >Subject: RE: Last Nights DC Cisco Meeting
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >It is the Certification Zone
> >
> >Ehab
> >CCNP, ASE, MCSE, CNE
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Billy Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 11:41 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Last Nights DC Cisco Meeting
> >
> >
> >?
> >
> >"Nathan Casassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Think Cisco will get upset if I forward this info on?
> >>
> >> To pass the CCIE lab exam you must know this:
> >>
> >> "configure terminal"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Christine Johnson, CCNP" wrote:
> >>
> >> > Last night I attended a meeting where one of the Cisco vice
presidents
> >> > stated that Cisco is investing 50 million dollars in protecting the
> >Cisco
> >> > CCIE. They are going after any person that has an NDA agreement and
> >posts
> >> > things considered a violation and publishes the information on a
website
> >or
> >> > book. They stated that they were going after a guy named Howard
> >Berkowitz
> >> > for having a website that has 168 violations. They are sending him a
> >letter
> >> > stating he is no longer certified by Cisco and suing him down to a
> >> > Volkwagen. Does anyone know what website he has?
> >> >
> > > > Christine Johnson, CCNP
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
