>Listmembers,
>
>I wrote the BSCN on Monday, and I must say that I was
>underwhelmed. I read Halabi and Moy's book on OSPF a
>year or so ago so they weren't exactly top of mind,
>and used the BSCN guide. Even using this guide almost
>exclusively I scored well over 900 with ten days
>study.
>
>I hope that I just got an easy batch of questions from
>the pool. It doesn't bode well for the value of this
>certification if the bar is significantly lowered. I
>hope that they put the pass up to 790 as they did with
>the ACRC. Even at this level, it would still be a
>relatively easy exam.
>
>Does anybody else feel the same way? I don't want to
>see the value of this certification which so many of
>us are spending a considerable amount of money and
>time on plummet because of a relaxing of standards.
There are several fundamental issues here.
First, contrary to popular belief, it isn't in Cisco's interest to
keep the pool of certified people small -- AS LONG AS the pools at
each level can do the job.
From Cisco's principal perspective, the first purpose of the
certification program is to facilitate Cisco's outsourcing of support
to resellers. Yes, they certifications do have other benefits, but
that is Cisco's principal corporate goal.
I honestly don't know if someone in Cisco is doing something as
rational as saying what tasks should a BSCN certificated person be
able to do, as opposed to what general knowledge such a person to
have.
But if they have, it may not be inconsistent to lower standards if
they feel the standards are getting in the way of sales and support.
>
>If so, perhaps we could write individually or as a
>group to Cisco to recommend a reevaluation of their
>passing grades/exam development. If I am way out in
>left field on this, my apologies to the list for
>lowering the s/n ratio:P
>
>Best regards,
>
>Geoffrey Zinderdine
>CCNA MCP2K CCA BLAH BLAH BLAH
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
