well........ did you try to ping them ?? or maybe telnet to them??
Perhaps those routes are "internal" to US West.
The routes themselves are probably not being "advertised" on the internet.
I just tried to ping them from two very physically different connected
sources - with no response.
Of course, my two ISPs may well be blocking them. (as they should be)
Traceroute just told you how it got there, not necessarily that those
addresses are available to the world.
Kevin Wigle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, 25 February, 2001 17:01
Subject: Private Internet Addressing
> I did a traceroute to one of US West's customers... got some interesting
results:
>
> 13 206 ms 179 ms 123 ms gig0-0-0.phnx-sust1.phnx.uswest.net
[206.80.192.253]
> 14 1016 ms 151 ms 975 ms 207.224.191.2
> 15 233 ms 124 ms 123 ms 192.168.8.1
> 16 151 ms 179 ms 123 ms 192.168.100.147
> 17 247 ms 192 ms 151 ms vdsl-130-13-102-120.phnx.uswest.net
[130.13.102.120]
>
> RFC 1918 - "Address Allocation for Private Internets" indicates
192.168.0.0 through 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) is reserved
> for private internets. Hops 15 and 16 in my traceroute show that
addresses within this range are being used publically.
>
> Did I miss something? Have the "for private use only" IP addresses now
been given the green light to be used within the internet?
>
>
> -- Leigh Anne
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
