Hi,

Sorry I did not read carefully enough it could be your transceiver is broken.

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia

On Saturday, February 24, 2001 at 02:07:06 PM, Matt Wehland wrote:

> Hello,
> In my last message 'Thanks for the Archives' I mentioned that I had found 
> the answer to my E0 'line protocol down' problem.  Well I lied, although 
> turning off keepalive with the command 'no keepalive' under the E0 
> interface gives the 'line protocol up' message, the interface isn't really 
> working, seems no keepalive is good if you don't have anything to plug the 
> router into.  I had the AUI transceiver connected to my no name 10/100 
> switch.  The tranceiver (LanArt)was showing link down (1 blink).
> I decided to plug it into my 1924 switch and it works fine.
> Made up a crossover cable and connected the 1924 to the no-name 10/100 and 
> it works fine, also.  I can connect from either the 10/100 uplink (25-26) 
> or the regular 10MG ports (1-24)
> 
> Why will the 1924 talk to the no name, but the 2501 won't?
> 
> Is it possible something with the transceiver (I guess I could try the the 
> same transceiver on the AUI port on the 1924 later)?
> 
> Some other misc. questions
> 
> I made up an ethernet loopback plug (RJ-45 with pins 1-3, 2-6) and plugged 
> it into the transceiver on the 2501, still couldn't get the line 
> up.  Unplug the transceiver and plug it back in (resetting it) and it 
> works, line protocol up.
> 
> AUI transceiver loopback
> I read about this beast in the archives, anyone know of a pinout?
> Can it be used in place of a transceiver and a ethernet loopback?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt Wehland
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


--
www.tasmail.com


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to