I second that. We had problems with inconsistency, esp when they are both
set as auto. It's esp true if you are serving Mac's.
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Circusnuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Circusnuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Shaun Wakelen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "Cisco GS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cisco/3Com compatibility
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:02:50 -0200
I agree- lock that 3500 in the same mode as the 3Com.
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Shaun Wakelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Cisco GS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco/3Com compatibility
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Shaun Wakelen wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > Does anybody have any experience of compatibility issues between a
Cisco
> > switch and a 3Com switch? We have a 3548 connected to a 3Com SuperStack
II
> > Desktop Switch. The link is manually set up as 100MB full duplex, and a
show
> > interface on the 3548 shows a large number of CRC errors, but no
collisions.
> > Reading various docs, I believe that this would normally be caused by
> > excessive noise.
> >
>
> It is good to force duplex/speed when inter-connecting switches.
>
> Brian
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
