Phil,
Had no problems with this before.. on All my other labs.. I don't believe
the problem was on the AGS+(w/ 11.0(22) code..
Nigel.
>From: "Virnoche, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Virnoche, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Nigel Taylor'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cisco Group Study
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, CCIE_Lab Group Study
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Another Frame-relay issue..
>Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:23:23 -0800
>
>Sounds like an improper LMI type,..... LMI doesn't autosense on 11.0 code.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:57 AM
>To: Cisco Group Study; CCIE_Lab Group Study
>Subject: Another Frame-relay issue..
>
>
>All,=20
> I made another weird discovery this morning in one of my =
>practice labs. The lab equipment in use;
>
>AGS+ : 11.0(22) Frame-relay cloud
>R1 2501 : 12.0.9(15) Hub sub-interface(s0.1 P-t-P1.1.1.1), and =
>(s0.2, ip 2.2.2.1) Multipoint
>R2 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 1.1.1.2
>R3 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.2
>R4 2520 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.3
>
>After setting the frame circuit and the Hub and spoke routers the HUB =
>specific local DLCI's come up and go active on the frame switch, the =
>spoke DLCI's go active the inactive, then deleted. I looked at every =
>thing that made sense,=20
>
>1)Is the HUB - is the interface-dlci command using the correct dlci's , =
>Yes! =20
>2) At the spokes is the encapsulation type(frame relay) configured, Yes!
>3) Is the ip (L3) configured on all devices, Yes!
>
>Ok, a "clear frame inverse-arp" and a good sign I get an arp for R2 on =
>the hub! A second look shows R2 has no mappings and the pvc is =
>inactive. No matter what I did nothing.
>
>No this is really weird... Before I started this lab I did a "wr erase" =
>on all the routers. I proceeded to do a "wr mem" for the first time =
>since entering all my commands for my frame relay setup on the HUB, and =
>out of nowhere all the Spoke DLCI's go active and everything works like =
>it's suppose too.
>
>No, in everything things I've read it says that the commands go active =
>as they're entered, however here it seemed to require me to wr mem for =
>the circuit to come up. Has anyone seen this or have it happen in the =
>past.
>
>Thanks
>
>Nigel.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
>unsubscribe ccielab
>
>_______________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
>unsubscribe ccielab
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
