How to determine which interface if the router got 72 interfaces? Based on
the routing table? Are there any test we can perform to test the result? I
ask so because I have a router with two interfaces connecting with ISPs,
some route-map setting is applied so that each time the router will select
out-going interface alternatively. I have some access-list applied on
out-going interfaces. I have enabled the interface going out but the fact is
that when I ping www.cnn.com in console, no DSN translation is done and the
ping failure as bad address but when I ping 207.25.71.28, one of the
www.cnn.com, I get return packets. If I try using traceroute I even can get
the FQDN back? So that make I suspect whether the router is using other IP
address in performing the ping. Any Idea?

Thanks
Fanglo



""Andrew Cook"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The router would use the IP address of the interface by which the packet
> leaves the router unless you choose otherwise.
>
> Andrew
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Fanglo MA
> > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 1:06 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: IP Address
> >
> >
> > Dear ALL,
> >
> > One simple question and would like someone direct me the answer:
> >
> > On a router, 26xx, if ping www.cnn.com is executed in via
> > console, what is
> > the IP address the router would use?
> >
> > regards,
> > Fanglo
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to