As stated in the first line of my message to him... I made a few assumptions
based on his request. My answer is by NO means the god given truth. First
off I was not giving a recommendation and you r right in that I dont know a
lot of the information needed to give a recommendation. I was mearly stating
my idea on ideal network conditions (textbook generalities as u put it).

By the way I did not read the DCN book, I read the BCMSN book. That what
books are meant for. To gain knowledge.

Santosh


""Groupstudy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How on earth can you make recommendations without knowing more about the
> network you are working on?   We have no idea of the quantitly of users,
the
> traffic patterns, whether the company is hosting its own DMZ, how fast
their
> links are, what routing protocol(s) they run, their addressing
scheme...need
> I go on?
>
> Sounds like you just read the DCN book and are spouting textbook
> generalities.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Santosh Koshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 5:20 AM
> Subject: Re: A design problem of switched network
>
>
> > I am going to make a few assumptions here based on your request
> >
> >                         4003                4003                4003
> >
> >                                     6509                6509
> >
> >                                                   PIX
> >
> >                                                 WWW
> >
> > 1) Dont run any kind of routing at the core layer.... leave that job for
> the
> > distribution layer
> > 2) Now since there is no L3 routing taking place at the core, it means
> that
> > there are going to be 2 subnets from the distribution switches to the
core
> > switches. All the links to the first 6509 will be on one VLAN and all
the
> > wires going to the 2nd switch will belong to the second VLAN.
> > 3) Get a Pix with 3 interfaces. Use 1 as an external interface (to www),
> and
> > use the other two as internal interfaces (one going to each of the 2
> VLAN's
> > the 4003's) are connected to.
> >
> > With the above setup your traffic will be load balanced.... and both
> subnets
> > will be in use...
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> > Santosh Koshy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ""frank"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > 992dnf$jd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:992dnf$jd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Now I want to design a lan for a company, i want to use 2 6509s as
core
> > > switches for redundancy ,several 4003 as distribution switches .Each
> 4003
> > > connect to 6509 seperately ,2 6509 connect to a  pix  which  links to
> > > internet.
> > > What puzzled me is how to deal with these 2 6509s.Do they need to be
> > > connected with GEC technology and apply HSRP on them ?If they don't
have
> > > links ,which link should a 4003 choose to visit internet?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to