Though I hate any Cisco GUI and by nature hate GUIs
when it comes to newtroking equipment the LUI is OK.
It also allows you to have much more features that are
very much lacking in the LD. These include different
means of loadbalancing.
I'd still do the base config on the CLI though. But
thats just me.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Some people will disagree with me, but in this
> particular instance, I
> suggest you download the Local Director User
> Interface (LUI)from Cisco. You
> can set this up without having to hop into the
> command line letting you make
> your configurations with ease. It's really easy to
> use and lets you set up
> probes to properly create a fail over monitor.
> Additionally, I find it
> great to use for 'emergency repairs' permitting you
> to take servers offline
> while making it invisible to the end user.
> Optimally, I would set this up to load balance
> between the two and have a
> fail over probe ready to take the questionable
> server out of service.
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Local Director config check
>
>
> Hi all -
>
> Is anyone familiar enough with the LocalDirector
> enough to check this
> config? The desired effect seems simple enough:
> |-- port 80 to server 1 with
> failover on server 2
> www.mydomain.com----|-- port 443 to server 1 with
> failover on server 2
> |-- port 8080 to server 1 with
> failover on server 2
>
> If www.mydomain.com is 192.168.10.10
> Server 1 is 10.10.10.1
> Server 2 is 10.10.10.2
>
> Is this right?
>
> real 10.10.10.1:80 is
> real 10.10.10.1:443 is
> real 10.10.10.1:8080 is
>
> real 10.10.10.2:80 is
> real 10.10.10.2:443 is
> real 10.10.10.2:8080 is
>
> virtual 192.168.10.10:80
> virtual 192.168.10.10:443
> virtual 192.168.10.10:8080
>
> bind 192.168.10.10:80 10.10.10.1:80
> bind 192.168.10.10:80 10.10.10.2:80
>
> bind 192.168.10.10:443 10.10.10.1:443
> bind 192.168.10.10:443 10.10.10.2:443
>
> bind 192.168.10.10:8080 10.10.10.1:8080
> bind 192.168.10.10:8080 10.10.10.2:8080
>
> Thanks - I don't have anyone on staff that knows the
> LD any better than I,
> so I need a sanity check before I take down the
> company web site. :/
>
> Optionally, is there any way to config the LD to
> fail over both 80 and 443
> if one or the other fails?
>
>
> Doug Roberts, CCNA
> ==========================
> "There are a lot of interesting people here, a
> pretty high concentration of
> creative, interesting, smart people. You just have
> to make an effort to
> group them together, because they're interspersed
> with a lot of morons."
>
> Aimee Mann as quoted in The Onion
> ==========================
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====
_____________________________________________
Moe Tavakoli
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
