It is and it isn't. I won't argue that Cisco positions the OSR vs Juniper in some
situations, but it really does depend on what the desired functionality is. Hence my
question "what is the desired role?" which seems yet unanswered.
Pete
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 3/19/2001 at 8:12 PM Frank cisco wrote:
>I think it is a plausible question , because Cisco is positioning the
>Cat6509 as a optical services router. The new router 7600 is a Cat6509
>with
>OSM (Optical Service module) module ....
>
>
>>From: "Peter Van Oene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Peter Van Oene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Frankie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Catalyst vs Juniper
>>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:57:58 -0500
>>
>>What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP
>>router with an enterprise L2/L3 box. Not that this is the first time
>I've
>>heard the question :)
>>
>>Pete
>>
>>
>>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>
>>On 3/13/2001 at 12:26 PM Frankie wrote:
>>
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >Anyone do a comparative analysis between Cisco's Catalyst 6500 to, say,
>> >Juniper's M10?
>> >
>> >
>> >_________________________________
>> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>_________________________________
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
