That is most true :) For some reason I read the post and thought that rtr A was
2.2.2.2. Thanks for catching that!
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/6/2001 at 7:30 AM fwells12 wrote:
>Re-read the question Pete. Your answer is exactly right, but he is
>correct
>too in that the distribute list should say IN in this case.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Peter Van Oene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 5:35 AM
>Subject: Re: bgp filtering
>
>
>> You have to think about this from the perspective of the bgp update
>itself. The update is going "out" to the neighbor and thus out makes sense
>in this context. Should you want to filter updates from the neighbor, in
>would be the case.
>>
>> The interesting/confusing thing is that you do outbound filters to
>influence inbound traffic and inbound filters to influence outbound traffic
>:)
>>
>> Pete
>>
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>
>> On 4/6/2001 at 1:02 AM Alec Smiths wrote:
>>
>> >Router A
>> >
>> >neighbor 2.2.2.2 distribute-list 1 out
>> >access-list 1 deny 160.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
>> >
>> >In this case router A wants to deny updates for
>> >network 160.0.0.0 propagated from router b (2.2.2.2)
>> >to router a . But why does it say OUT instead of IN,
>> >in the distribute-list ??
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >Alec
>> >
>> >__________________________________________________
>> >Do You Yahoo!?
>> >Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
>> >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
s
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
