>Hi Howard,
>
>It's really not a problem at this point, I wanted to explore my options. I
>always recommend one-one but, I've some hard headed colleagues I work with.
>
>Nabil
Why do your colleagues think multiple subnets are a good idea?
Cringing at the thought they like multiple VLANs per port, an
atrocity introduced by 3Com and that Cisco was driven to support due
to FUD.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Howard C. Berkowitz
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:55 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: VLAN and IP question [7:240]
>
>
>>Greetings all,
>>
>>I've a 6509 with MSFC card. I'm trying to find the best to have more than
>>one subnet to a VLAN. I thought you guys might have some feedback to
>offer.
>>I really want to stay away from secondary interfaces at this point.
>>Basically, trying to plan for future growth!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Nabil
>>
>
>What problem are you trying to solve? Having one VLAN = one subnet
>is a pretty fundamental architectural goal.
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=261&t=240
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
