Thanks all, I never ever even considered that. (If you listen closely, you can hear the sound of me smacking my forehead repeatedly> Ejay Hire 804-220-7724 877-200-7020,x7724 ... Answers are free. Explanations will cost you a Diet Pepsi. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT with one address WAS RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:361] Yes. Quoting from: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/ionetn/prodlit/1195_pp.htm As a convenience for users wishing to translate all inside addresses to the address assigned to an interface on the router, the NAT code allows one to simply name the interface when configuring the dynamic translation rule: ip nat inside source list interface overload If there is no address on the interface, or it the interface is not up, no translation will occur. Example: ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial0 overload There are other examples on CCO. They have recently rearranged the pages and I can't find them. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321] > > > Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you > only have one > usable IP address? I perused CCO, and the most minimalistic > NAT/PAT config > I can find still requires 2 (1 interface, one global) addresses. The > Linksys/Netgear jobbies do it with one IP. > > i.e. > > ISP - ISP router Ethernet (216.142.0.1 255.255.255.252) - (216.142.0.2 > 255.255.255.252) Router - Internal network. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=375&t=375 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
