I can't any reason why it wouldn't work. The only thing I would mention is
that older IOS using EIGRP doesn't allow you to specify a mask with the
network command, and wouldn't allow you to be granular with your networks if
you don't want to specify all of them to be known in EIGRP. If you want all
the networks in your EIGRP tables, then it'll work just fine. You might
also need to consider 'no auto-summary,' depending on how well you've
planned (or rather, if there is a lack of planning and summarization will
cause a problem).
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
""SH Wesson"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Our existing network consists of a flat network at 172.16.0.0 with a mask
of
> 255.255.0.0 and 172.31.0.0 with a mask of 255.255.0.0. Since it is flat,
> the networks are 172.16.2.0 - 172.16.12.0 mask 255.255.0.0. EIGRP is
> running. Now, the question I have is, if I create new subnets to segment
> the place with networks like 172.20.10.0, 172.20.11.0, 172.12.0, etc all
> with masks of 255.255.255.0 and if I run EIGRP also. If I were to run
both
> the above networks at once and within the same EIGRP process, would it
cause
> any problems. Thanks.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=646&t=638
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
