Roger,

I ran into the same problem you had. You want to run enterprise images with
all the bells and whistles and be 12.0 ver.

The only wy was for me to up grade all of my routers to 16 meg flash. Yes a
bit costly but in the end to be able

to get things done well in a home lab is to have an IOS that have the
multifuntionality that will be found on those routers

which you will be tested on. The 11.1 enterprise image will run on 8 megs of
flash. also the enterprise plus in 11.2 will

also run on 8 megs of flash.

Raul

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Roger Sohn
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 11:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Choosing the right IOS Image [7:739]


Hi All,

Just wanted to hear what other people are using (or would recommend) for the
IOS images on their 2500 series routers with a typical 16MB DRAM/ 8MB Flash
setup.

I remember hearing from Louie that he ran 12.09 Enterprise Plus IOS on all
of his 2500's with that 16/8 configuration.  There's a 12.7 version but it
won't fit on only 8MB of flash space.  Does this mean that I should I
consider upgrading to 16MB flash instead?

On another note, can anyone recommend a good reference for knowing which
type of IOS images to use?  Like how I can assess whether I would want to
use a Service Provider image rather than an Enterprise image, or an IP
Image, or maybe even an Enterprise/FW/IDS IPSEC image.  I'm trying to find
out more information on what requirements would prompt me to choose one over
the other.

I've only been able to find a few docs on CCO and they haven't helped me
much.

Any info is always appreciated!

Thanks,
Roger
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=741&t=739
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to